Last year, I wrote an open letter to Senator Patty Murray pleading with her to reconsider the lavish financial support charter schools were slated to receive in the soon to be re-authorized ESEA.
The Supreme Court has found the Washington State Legislature in contempt for not fulfilling its duty to fully fund basic education.
The federal government made this situation even worst when it allowed aid to states to expire in 2012. This money was being used by states to keep our public schools running.
Given the precarious state of public school funding in Washington State, I’m confused by your willingness to include generous funding for charter schools in the ESEA.
Not only did the Supreme Court rule Washington State’s charter law unconstitutional, but charter schools have a track record for all kinds of financial scandals. Don’t believe me? Just google “charter school scandals” and take a look.
We can’t afford to have any dollars diverted from our classrooms. Any dollar lost to scandal is one not being spent on the 1 million public school students in Washington State.
The rest is history.
The ESEA sailed through Congress and with President Obama’s signature – became law as the ESSA.
In November, Patty Murray – supporter of the TPP and co-author of the ESSA – skated to another term with 59% of the vote.
The only kink was Trump’s victory and his selection of Betsy DeVos to be the new Secretary of Education. THAT was a buzz kill.
Suddenly, Democrats and progressives (whatever that means anymore) couldn’t stop talking about charters and the evils of privatization.
Here’s the thing: Democrats are just as into charter schools as Republicans. The only difference is the language they use to sell the idea to their supporters. Democrats talk about gaps while the Republicans complain about the public education monopoly.
Don’t believe me?
In September, President Obama’s Secretary of Education, John King, sent out a press release announcing $245 million in new grants for charter schools. $245 million !?!
“Ensuring that all students have access to an academically challenging and engaging education is critical to preparing them for college and career success,” said U.S. Secretary of Education John B. King Jr. “Innovative charter schools are continuously developing new and impactful practices to close achievement gaps and provide all students with the skills and abilities they need to thrive. We are proud to support these efforts along with strong charter school authorizing and accountability, particularly given these grantees’ commitment to communities facing steep academic challenges.”
(Did you see the word gaps?)
I’m done with Democrats who only activate their moral compasses when a Republican is President. I don’t have the time or patience to support an organization that puts scoring political points over principles.
Remember when Hillary Clinton made big headlines by trying to sell NEA members on the lesser of two evils argument that non-profit charters were a vast improvement over the garden variety charter school?
Think about it: The Democratic Party’s candidate for President of the United States, Hillary Clinton, was campaigning as a supporter of charter schools — to an audience full of teachers. You can’t be more pro-charter than that.
But now – with a Republican President and a potential Education Secretary who LOVES all things charter – Democrats and their progressive minions are beside themselves. Outraged, even.
Sorry to be a downer, but I can’t help wondering where all of these VERY concerned Democrats were a year ago.
Oh, I remember, they were in Congress, working with the charter lobby to re-write the ESSA, so privatization supporters could get EVERYTHING on their wish list.
It’s Worst Than You Think
Now, we come to the really bad part of the story. The ESSA – constructed in a bipartisan manner – is a doomsday device for public education AND it’s the law of the land.
Here’s the ESSA’s three arms of destruction:
- Accountability measured designed to create turn-around schools which are ripe for charter conversion.
- Innovative assessments to usher in online learning software, ELOs, and “anytime, any place learning”.
- Infusion of big federal dollars so charters can push out resource starved public schools
It appears the school privatizing lobby – within the Democratic Party – was so sure of a Clinton victory, they rushed to pass the ESSA – never considering the possibility of a Clinton loss.
Well, it happen.
Instead of the happy face of privatization offered by the Democratic Party, we’re faced with a Betsy Devos who can’t wait to push the red button and could care less about human suffering or the rubble left behind.
Charter Lobby Victory
The ESSA gave the charter lobby everything they wanted and then some. Take a look:
Specifically, changes to the Charter School Program (CSP) include the following:
The CSP now includes dedicated funding for the replication and expansion of high-performing charter schools. In addition, state grants can also be used for the same purpose.
The state grant program can now be administered by governors and charter support organizations in addition to state educational agencies.
The state grant program prioritizes funding to states that provide equitable resources to charter schools and that assist charters in accessing facilities.
The state grant program provides schools with additional spending flexibility for startup funds. For example, they will be allowed to use CSP funds to purchase a school bus and make minor facility improvements.
The state grant program includes new protections to ensure funds go to charter schools with autonomy and flexibility consistent with the definition of a charter school.
Charter school representatives must be included in Title I negotiated rule-making and must be included, like other stakeholders at the state and local level, in the implementation of many federal programs.
CSP recipients will have more flexibility to use a weighted lottery to increase access to charter schools for disadvantaged students. CSP grantees will also be permitted to use feeder patterns to prioritize students that attended earlier grades in the same network of charter schools.
Other provisions that affect charter schools include:
New and expanding charter schools are required to receive timely allocations of Title I allocations and to be “held harmless” in the same manner as other eligible Title I traditional public schools.
The highly qualified teacher requirement has been repealed. Charters are free to design personnel systems and hire staff that meet the unique needs of their school.
States are required to administer annual reading and math assessments in reading and math in grades 3-8, and once in high school. Science assessments are required once in each grade span: 3-5, 6-9 and 10-12.
States must hold all public schools accountable for improving student achievement of all students, as well as all subgroups of students.
Schools are also accountable for adjusted four year and extended cohort graduation rates.
LEAs have flexibility to use Title I funds for school improvement to increase the number of high-quality charter schools serving students attending failing schools.
New provisions to demonstrate compliance with the “supplement not supplant” requirement include additional flexibility in aligning federal program funds with their educational programs.
What can we learn from all of this?
Neoliberalism – and school privatization is straight out of the handbook – hurts people and the public institutions humans depend on.
The particular political leader pushing the neoliberal agenda doesn’t matter. Some will appear progressive, others conservative. It doesn’t matter.
Blind partisan loyalty is sucking the legitimacy out of our political process.
This has got to stop.
When your political team embraces part of the neoliberal agenda, you need to speak up and say “NO” – just as loudly as when the the other team does.
Otherwise, we’ll continue to be rewarded with dumpster fires like the ESSA.