A legal challenge has been filed in Washington State regarding the constitutionality of charter schools

no privatization

Educators and community groups file legal challenge to new charter school law

Statement by the Washington Education Association (WEA):

A coalition of educators and community groups has filed a legal demand with the Washington Attorney General challenging the constitutionality of Initiative 1240, the state’s new charter school law.

The demand asserts I-1240, the Charter School Act, violates the Washington Constitution by improperly diverting public school funds to private non-profit groups that are not subject to local voter control and impeding the state’s constitutional obligation to fund fully K-12 public education.

The League of Women Voters of Washington, the Washington Education Association and El Centro de la Raza filed the demand with the state attorney general’s office on Feb. 27.

“The Washington Supreme Court has ruled the state is violating its paramount duty to fund our public schools,” said Catherine Ahl of the League. “The Charter School Act drains money from public schools to privately run charter schools that aren’t accountable to local voters — taking away the right of citizens to elect representatives to oversee the spending of their taxes.”

The demand outlines at least seven constitutional problems with the Charter School Act:

  1. It violates the state’s constitutional “paramount duty” to provide for the education of children within its borders. In its 2012 McCleary decision, the Washington Supreme Court ordered the Legislature to fully fund basic educational programs by 2018. The Charter School Act interferes with the state’s progress toward compliance by diverting already insufficient resources away from public school districts.
  2. It unconstitutionally diverts funding that is restricted to use for public common schools to private charter schools that are not subject to local voter control.
  3. It violates the “general and uniform” requirement in the constitution because charter schools are not subject to most of the laws and regulations applicable to public school districts, including many of the common school provisions defining the elements of a basic education.
  4. It amends existing state law in a manner not permitted by the constitution.
  5. It violates the constitutional requirement that the superintendent of public instruction “have supervision over all matters pertaining to public schools.”
  6. Its language relating to the conversion of a public school into a charter school is unconstitutionally vague.
  7. It violates the constitution because it mandates the use of local voter-approved levy funds for a purpose other than the purpose for which the voters approved the levies.

The demand asks the attorney general’s office to address the unconstitutional provisions of the Charter School Act. If the attorney general’s office declines, the coalition will file a complaint in Superior Court. Paul Lawrence of Pacifica Law Group is the lead attorney in the case.

The League of Women Voters is a nonpartisan political organization. WEA represents nearly 82,000 public school employees. El Centro de la Raza is a Seattle-based group dedicated to social justice.


  1. This makes me happy! What are its chances for success, though? What’s Paul Lawrence’s success rate with this kind of thing and/or what’s the record of the court/judge where the lawsuit’s been filed re being receptive to these kinds of lawsuits? Thanks, Chris deMaagd Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:07:52 +0000 To: cedemaagd@outlook.com

    1. Apparently, the Attorney General will now review the demand to see if the new law does or does not conform with the state constitution. The new charter school law doesn’t conform with our state constitution but for now we have to see what the Attorney General says.

      According to our constitution, the State Superintendent is to oversee all schools. According to the charter school law, the superintendent does not oversee charter schools. Our state constitution demands public oversight, the new law demands that there be no public oversight.


  2. Hallelujuh! Now maybe the corporate and political education deform movement will be slapped down by the people! Parents unite and reclaim your schools and your education tax dollars. Stop the privatization of public education. Refuse state assessments. Respect our teachers and oppose pay for performance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s