Yes on Seattle Preschool Proposition 1A


I have researched both programs as seen in the 10 posts I have written on the programs.

My regret is that Burgess and others involved with 1B couldn’t come to the table with the proponents of 1A and work out a program that would work universally. Because of that, we have two proposals and unfortunately many people are confused as to how to vote.

I was confused also at first and it took me several weeks to sift through the information and talk with many people to come to my own conclusion.

First, let’s look at the ballot. This is how it will be worded:

 1. Should either or neither of these measures be enacted into law?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

2. Regardless of how you voted above, if one of these measures is enacted, which one should it be?

 [ ] Proposition 1A
 [ ] Proposition 1B

You can see that whether you vote Yes or No on the first question, you are to provide your opinion on which program you want.

This is where it gets tricky because we are under the impression that no matter what, one will be selected, whether voters think we should have a citywide preschool program or not. (Whacky? Absolutely. Can this be challenged? I believe it can.)

Because of the way the questions are worded, I recommend voting for 1A and to follow are my reasons in brief.

Why Yes 1A

  • It’s inclusive. All existing preschool programs can participate which provides greater choice for low income families.
  • Because it can include all programs it is easier to scale up to a county and even state level.
  • Teachers can be trained while working.
  • Wage increase to $15 per hour will be accelerated.
  • Educators who live and work in Seattle developed the program.
  • Families pay no more than 10% of their income across the board.

Why No on 1B

  • Programs must agree to a prescribed curriculum and set of “assessments” in order to participate.
  • An AA or BA is required which will displace existing teaching staff. 1B proponents say that scholarships will be provided but if you’re living on the edge financially, it will be very difficult, particularly if you have children.
  • $15 wage increase will occur per the city’s plan. (Which is too long in my book)
  • 1B continually uses the word “quality” preK and yet doesn’t support appropriate teacher training and wage increases.
  • Because of the standardized material, programs such as Montessori and Waldorf will probably not want to be involved which decreases the choice and opportunities for lower-income students.
  • By the way, 1B is not fully funded. They are short by about $20M. They say they will probably receive a state grant to cover the rest of the $58M they project it will cost to create and run the program for four years.

For more information on the propositions, please take a look at the homepage. All posts on this topic are now featured at that location.

Questions? Ask them here and I will do my best to answer them. If I don’t know the answer, I’ll find someone who does.


9 thoughts on “Yes on Seattle Preschool Proposition 1A

  1. says,”Proposition 1B requires a long list of specific activities in preschools. They could not have “playschools” or art-based preschools or preschools with lots of pretending. The teachers would have to check off items on a list to show that they are covering all of the topics. I HATE that idea for preschool. Young children need to be playing and pretending and running around. That is how they learn best. It is not right to make them sit still and raise hands and stand in lines and learn math and reading. They are too young. Brain research shows it is better to wait to about age 7 to start learning school skills. Research shows that starting earlier does not help children to do better in school or to have better lives. BUT, some families need to put their children in childcare. It is important for that childcare to be good quality, and not too expensive. But Proposition 1B doesn’t help with childcare. It is only preschool, and only for 3 and 4 year olds, and only for a small number of children. Proposition 1B is a very expensive way to set up rigid preschools for a few children. I don’t want Proposition 1A or Proposition 1B. But Proposition 1B would be “less bad” for the city.”

  2. Dora, I’m definitely going to vote NO on the first part with the hope and expectation that BOTH of these ultimately go down to defeat.

    However, I’m leaning towards just SKIPPING the next question and not choosing either 1A or 1B.

    Or are we obligated to vote for “Both Parts” if we wants our vote on the top one to count?

    Is there any reason NOT to skip the part below that comes after voting NO in opposition to both of them?

    I’d appreciate your advice and perspective. Thanks.

    1. That’s what I had planned to do but then I found out that no matter what, one of the programs will go forward based on which plan is favored.

      That’s why I am voting for 1A.

      Ultimately, this needs to be challenged in the courts.

      This is not Democracy.


  3. 1B is a bloated and highly paid initiative. The city already has enough administrative positions to run Seattle Public School district per Brown University Professor Kenneth Wong.

    1B aligns prek-5 in Seattle Public Schools and this is very concerning. Murray claims to have the ability to affect core functioning of SPS.

    1B is backed by Bill Gates and others that contributed to bringing charter schools into Washington State. I think there is a bigger picture and thank you for all of your work on this issue.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s