Update: January 22, 2013
House Bill 2133 for Student Privacy has been pulled from Executive Session for revisions and will be rescheduled for a committee vote next week.
Stay tuned.
What is the issue with student privacy?
There are a few:
It used to be that students’ grades, disciplinary records, teachers comments and test scores on standardized tests were kept in files that could only be accessed by personnel in the school or the district. Not so anymore.
The requirements now, thanks to Race to the Top, are that school districts are to hand over more student information than most parents would feel comfortable doing… if they knew what was being collected.
For as little as $1M, our district will be required to turn over a vast amount of information. This will cost the district far more than any amount of money that is rewarded. See The Road Map Project, Race to the Top, Bill Gates and your student’s privacy for the details.
Here are a few items that are being demanded (remarks in italics are mine):
Children ready to succeed in school by kindergarten (will this require pre-K testing?)
Students triggering Early Warning Indicator 1 and 2*
* Early warning indicators are for 6th and 9th grade students. EW1: Six or more absences and one or more course failure(s). EW2: One or more suspension(s) or expulsion(s)
Students who graduate high school on time
Students at community and technical colleges enrolling in pre-college coursework
Students who enroll in postsecondary education by age 24 (this will require tracking students beyond high school graduation)
Students who earn a post-secondary credential by age 24 (ditto)
Children born weighing less than 5.5 pounds
Families reading to their children daily
Children meeting age-level expectations at the end of preschool (Pre-school testing?)
English language learning students making progress in learning English
Students absent 20 or more days per year
Students who make a non-promotional school change
Students motivated and engaged to succeed in school (How is this measured?)
Students attending schools with low state achievement index ratings
Females age 15-17 giving birth
8th graders reporting select risk factors on the Healthy Youth Survey
Students exhibiting 21st century skills (?)
High school graduates completing a formal career and technical education program (This also requires tracking students beyond high school)
Graduating College Bound students who have completed the FAFSA
Students who directly enroll in postsecondary education
Students who did not complete high school on time who achieve a postsecondary credential
Students employed within 1 and 5 years of completing or leaving postsecondary education, including wage (Again, a requirement to track students past high school graduation.)
There is additional information that is required. To see the details, go to CCER, the Road Map Project and the loss of student privacy.
Is this more than you want others to know about your child?
Is it OK with you that any third-party who has an interest, commercial or otherwise, will be able to access this information including the Seattle Times?
Do you think this requirement for data could ultimately expand into additional areas of a students’ life?
House Bill 2133, Maintaining privacy of student educational records, has been revised since the public hearing last Wednesday.
The revised bill will require parental or guardian notification and consent for the sharing of student information.
If you are concerned and you live in the state of Washington, then contact the House Committee on Education and let them know as soon as possible. The committee will be meeting this Wednesday, January 22nd, to vote on whether the bill will move forward or not.
| Santos, Sharon Tomiko (D) Chair | JLOB 321 | (360) 786-7944 |
| Stonier, Monica (D) Vice Chair | JLOB 309 | (360) 786-7994 |
| Dahlquist, Cathy (R) * | JLOB 426 | (360) 786-7846 |
| Magendanz, Chad (R) ** | JLOB 427 | (360) 786-7876 |
| Bergquist, Steve (D) | JLOB 322 | (360) 786-7862 |
| Fey, Jake (D) | JLOB 330 | (360) 786-7974 |
| Haigh, Kathy (D) | JLOB 320 | (360) 786-7966 |
| Hargrove, Mark (R) | JLOB 409 | (360) 786-7918 |
| Hawkins, Brad (R) | LEG 122G | (360) 786-7832 |
| Hayes, Dave (R) | JLOB 467 | (360) 786-7914 |
| Hunt, Sam (D) | LEG 438B | (360) 786-7992 |
| Klippert, Brad (R) | JLOB 410 | (360) 786-7882 |
| Lytton, Kristine (D) | JLOB 310 | (360) 786-7800 |
| Muri, Dick (R) | JLOB 424 | (360) 786-7890 |
| Orwall, Tina (D) | JLOB 326 | (360) 786-7834 |
| Parker, Kevin (R) | JLOB 421 | (360) 786-7922 |
| Pollet, Gerry (D) | JLOB 317 | (360) 786-7886 |
| Seaquist, Larry (D) | LEG 132C | (360) 786-7802 |
| Warnick, Judy (R) | LEG 427 | (360) 786-7932 |
Next we will need to know who is getting what in terms of our student’s data. Too many agreements have been made behind closed doors about student information without our knowledge.
Submitted by Dora Taylor
Post Script:
How Murdoch, Bill Gates and Big Corporations Are Data Mining Our Schools
Last week, students across New York finished a set of tests taken over a two week period designed to measure their proficiency at reading and math against new federal college readiness standards known as Common Core. Some parents opted their children out of the exams in protest against what they described as the school system’s over-emphasis on testing and its use of data as the principle indicator of their children’s achievement.
Starting next year, those scores, along with students’ personal information – race, economic background, report cards, discipline records and personal addresses – will be stored in a database designed by Wireless Generation, a subsidiary of media mogul Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation.
That’s right, Rupert Murdoch can read your child’s report card anytime he likes and he knows where your kid is sleeping. The database will be managed by inBloom inc, a non-profit outfit that, like Wireless Generation, is under the domain of billionaire Bill Gates – who, together with the Carnegie Corporation and other philanthropic organizations, set up the company via his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
inBloom is receiving $50 million for their services from the New York Education Department through a contract awarded last fall. Data analyzing firms, educational software designers and other third-party venders, both for and not-for-profit, will be granted access to student information.
inBloom is receiving $50 million for their services from the New York Education Department through a contract awarded last fall. Data analyzing firms, educational software designers and other third-party venders, both for and not-for-profit, will be granted access to student information.
New York is not alone in turning to student data tracking system to measure performance. Some 200,000 U.S. teachers use Wireless Generation software as part of a national trend in which education administrators are increasingly turning to data analysis to grasp why America’s pupils are flunking when compared to the rest of the world.
To read more on this, go to the Indypendent.
Did this bill move forward?
Dora,
I have been reading through this bill and is this intended to help prevent the release of student information? Just want to make sure I am understanding it correctly.
Susan
No, the revised bill will mandate that all parents or guardians be notified of the information that is to be disclosed to a third party.
It needs to be a form that offers parents to opt their students out of information being provided to the military as we have now although many schools don’t make parents aware of that option.
Unfortunately, many school districts in our state got together and signed onto Race to the Top funding and in return, had to gather this information and turn it over to the Federal Government. The routing of this information is not clear. It will more than likely go through an intermediary that will sort it. We don’t know who or what their agreement is in terms of the privacy of the information.
There is no transparency or any guarantees at this time.
A second bill that is in the works would demand clarification of what student information will go to what parties. That at least will provide information that we need to determine how we move forward.
We have made our deal with the devil. The school districts involved have made a contract with the Federal Government, meaning Arne Duncan and the US Department of Education, to turn over student data for a few dollars. We would have to break the contract and remove ourselves from the consortium that we have joined. That will take time and a lot of lobbying on the part of parents, students, teachers and concerned citizens.
For now, informing parents of the information that is being culled is a first step.
The other option parents have at this time is to opt their students out of standardized tests and refusing to provide personal information that they don’t want to have in the stratosphere of the internet.
Dora